At Sun, 9 Sep 2018 18:52:57 -0700 (PDT), Jack Firth wrote:
> If I make a symbol with `gensym` (or do anything else that creates a new
> value that's not `eq?` to any other value) in some module, what are the
> absolute upper limits on my ability to use that symbol within the module
> without all
Good call, I'll be careful about that in future examples.
David Storrs writes:
> This is a very cool thing, but may I suggest choosing a different name than
> 'can'? '(can-unseal lunch)' reads less like a verb and more like a
> predicate where someone forgot the '?' -- "Are you able to unseal lu
Matthias Felleisen writes:
>> On Sep 10, 2018, at 10:09 AM, Christopher Lemmer Webber
>> wrote:
>>
>> Jack Firth writes:
>>
>>> If I make a symbol with `gensym` (or do anything else that creates a new
>>> value that's not `eq?` to any other value) in some module, what are the
>>> absolute upper
This is a very cool thing, but may I suggest choosing a different name than
'can'? '(can-unseal lunch)' reads less like a verb and more like a
predicate where someone forgot the '?' -- "Are you able to unseal lunch?"
as opposed to "Unseal my lunch now".
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Christoph
> On Sep 10, 2018, at 10:09 AM, Christopher Lemmer Webber
> wrote:
>
> Jack Firth writes:
>
>> If I make a symbol with `gensym` (or do anything else that creates a new
>> value that's not `eq?` to any other value) in some module, what are the
>> absolute upper limits on my ability to use t
Jack Firth writes:
> If I make a symbol with `gensym` (or do anything else that creates a new
> value that's not `eq?` to any other value) in some module, what are the
> absolute upper limits on my ability to use that symbol within the module
> without allowing any other modules to get ahold of th
6 matches
Mail list logo
