-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This cheat sheet is accurate. What imo you don't get from it
is the solid structure that paredit provides. You cannot unbalance
your parens without some effort (like explicitly cutting out a
region). This frees up the mental effort of checking out if y
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:51 PM, John Clements
wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:22 AM, John Clements
>>> wrote:
On Aug 30, 2012, at 2:43 PM
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:21 AM, John Clements
wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:22 AM, John Clements
>>> wrote:
On Aug 30, 2012, at 2:43 PM
On Aug 30, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:22 AM, John Clements
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 30, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote:
>>>
What holds me personally to em
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:22 AM, John Clements
> wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 30, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote:
>>
>>> What holds me personally to emacs is paredit for now. DR is rocking these
>>> days,
>>> specially debuggin
On Aug 30, 2012, at 8:55 PM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:22 AM, John Clements
> wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 30, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote:
>>
>>> What holds me personally to emacs is paredit for now. DR is rocking these
>>> days,
>>> specially debugging
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:22 AM, John Clements
wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote:
>
>> What holds me personally to emacs is paredit for now. DR is rocking these
>> days,
>> specially debugging wise.
>
> Really? We've got most of what paredit offers, including mapping r
On 2012-08-30 15:19:21 -0700, John Clements wrote:
> Come to think of it, I'm not sure how commenting-out works in paredit.
> What if I insert a semicolon that comments out several close parens,
> and no open parens? I would try it myself, but it looks like paredit
> is something that needs to be i
John Clements wrote at 08/30/2012 06:19 PM:
My recollection is that DivaScheme wasn't well-integrated into the existing editor, and
relied on re-parsing the input after each keystroke. I think that if you wanted
something more like paredit, it might simply suffice to add bindings for the
"clo
On Aug 30, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Eduardo Bellani wrote at 08/30/2012 06:00 PM:
>> Paredit is more structured than what I can get out of emacs. It does
>> not allow me
>> to get my sexps unbalanced. For instance, to close and align all the
>> parens I just go on pressing ')' unt
Eduardo Bellani wrote at 08/30/2012 06:00 PM:
Paredit is more structured than what I can get out of emacs. It does
not allow me
to get my sexps unbalanced. For instance, to close and align all the
parens I just go on pressing ')' until I
hit the end of the function I'm working on.
There was
*get out of DR
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote:
> Paredit is more structured than what I can get out of emacs. It does
> not allow me
> to get my sexps unbalanced. For instance, to close and align all the
> parens I just go on pressing ')' until I
> hit the end of the funct
Paredit is more structured than what I can get out of emacs. It does
not allow me
to get my sexps unbalanced. For instance, to close and align all the
parens I just go on pressing ')' until I
hit the end of the function I'm working on.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Ray Racine wrote:
> I've ena
I've enabled auto parens and square with highlight et al in DR and use the
sexp movement key combos and I'm pretty happy with it. I was never a heavy
user of paredit in emacs, though an admirer.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote:
> What holds me personally to emacs is pared
On Aug 30, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote:
> What holds me personally to emacs is paredit for now. DR is rocking these
> days,
> specially debugging wise.
Really? We've got most of what paredit offers, including mapping raw left-paren
to matched-pair (this option is currently called "
What holds me personally to emacs is paredit for now. DR is rocking these days,
specially debugging wise.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Ray Racine wrote:
> FWIW, I've used the high quality Quack and then the glorious Geiser for
> several years. During this same period, on occasion I'd give DR
FWIW, I've used the high quality Quack and then the glorious Geiser for
several years. During this same period, on occasion I'd give DR a trial
only to quickly retreat. That is no longer the case as of several months
ago. I've switched solely to DR and haven't mulled for a moment about
reversing
I moved Geiser to before Quack in that table, since I understand Geiser
is fancier as an IDE (and can use Quack for the editing part).
But hopefully the forthcoming Meow will give Geiser a run for its money
in the Emacs fanciness department. :)
Neil
Racket Users list:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> Thanks! I guess all we need now is a WeScheme link -- Matthias
Ok, I've added a WeScheme page with some content.
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
Thanks! I guess all we need now is a WeScheme link -- Matthias
On Aug 29, 2012, at 11:54 PM, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24 2012, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
>> Geiser is it. Thanks.
>
> I've updated the details for Geiser in the Wikipedia page on IDE
> comparison [0]. Thanks!
On Fri, Aug 24 2012, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> Geiser is it. Thanks.
I've updated the details for Geiser in the Wikipedia page on IDE
comparison [0]. Thanks!
Cheers,
jao
[0]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_integrated_development_environments#Racket
Racket
Okay, I have added Geiser. Could others please contribute more specific details
as appropriate? The information I supplied (except for DrRacket) are
placeholder.
On Aug 24, 2012, at 12:14 PM, ozzloy-racket-users wrote:
> maybe you're thinking of geiser?
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:45 AM
Geiser is it. Thanks.
On Aug 24, 2012, at 12:14 PM, ozzloy-racket-users wrote:
> maybe you're thinking of geiser?
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>
> I have added a placeholder for DrRacket, Emacs Quack, and WeScheme:
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
maybe you're thinking of geiser?
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> I have added a placeholder for DrRacket, Emacs Quack, and WeScheme:
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_integrated_development_environments#Racket
>
> Would the concerned party please fil
I have added a placeholder for DrRacket, Emacs Quack, and WeScheme:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_integrated_development_environments#Racket
Would the concerned party please fill in details? Also I am sure that I have
overlooked another Emacs-y thing that has been announced her
25 matches
Mail list logo
