On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:20:51 -0500
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Jan 3, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
>
> > Is there a coding style guideline for racket? A place where
> > questions like this one are answered already?
>
>
> I have had five pages for two months now ... Next time
On Jan 3, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
> Is there a coding style guideline for racket? A place where
> questions like this one are answered already?
I have had five pages for two months now ... Next time I come up for air I'll
air it on 'dev'
_
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:33:19 -0500
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> There is. An experienced programmer (*) should go with the second form.
>
> (*) someone who can handle error messages and subtle changes to them.
hehe ... sounds like a challenge :-)
I'll be a good boy then, and use local from now
FWIW, there have been some (somewhat) recent changes to the way
internal definitions work that make them behave much better. In
particular, if you have a bunch of internal definitions with
expressions interspersed, then they all go in the same (recursive)
scope.
Robby
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:33
On Jan 3, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
> Hi.
>
> In the web-server related documentation, I see the preferred way to
> create local procedures as
>
> (define (start request)
>(local ((define (response-generator...))
>(define (some-handler...)))
> (do-something
5 matches
Mail list logo
