Here's a much longer talk that might be of interest to you:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=kkTFx3-duc8
It's about moving (partly) from OOP to FP, discusses the advantages of the
latter for design, mutation, but also the cases where OO is still useful.
It's by Martin Oders
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:04 PM, John Clements wrote:
>
> It depends on a .png file, which I'll send you separately.
If you check out the git repository corresponding to that gist, you
can add the .png file.
Sam
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
On Jul 2, 2013, at 10:20 PM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> Yes!!! That was what I had in mind!! Thanks John!
>
> (And yes, if you can share the slides, that'd be even better)
Sure, here's the slideshow source.
https://gist.github.com/jbclements/5921746
It depends on a .png file, which I'll send you se
Yes!!! That was what I had in mind!! Thanks John!
(And yes, if you can share the slides, that'd be even better)
-- Éric
On Jun 27, 2013, at 21:08, John Clements wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Eric Tanter wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I remember that someone, some time ago (how precise!),
On Jun 27, 2013, at 11:49 PM, Laurent wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:08 PM, John Clements
> wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Eric Tanter wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I remember that someone, some time ago (how precise!), posted on this list
> > a link to a couple of slides t
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:08 PM, John Clements wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Eric Tanter wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I remember that someone, some time ago (how precise!), posted on this
> list a link to a couple of slides that nicely and concisely illustrate the
> advantages of pure funct
On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember that someone, some time ago (how precise!), posted on this list a
> link to a couple of slides that nicely and concisely illustrate the
> advantages of pure functions vs. impure ones when doing testing.
Sorry for the late
Thanks!
Frame conditions are (I think) only implicitly hinted at by Stephen's slide (I
guess that's the point of the line `getOther()==-4 //hasn't changed').
-- Éric
On Jun 13, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> I don't have slides and I don't recall this post, but I recall po
On Jun 12, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> I remember that someone, some time ago (how precise!), posted on this list a
> link to a couple of slides that nicely and concisely illustrate the
> advantages of pure functions vs. impure ones when doing testing.
This is probably not what you
I don't have slides and I don't recall this post, but I recall posting
somewhere, not too long ago (this is conceptual not verbatim):
PURE FUNCTIONS
are tested via
-- f(in) = out
IMPURE FUNCTIONS NEE
are tested via
-- set up state
-- set up frame condition testing
-- f(in) = out %%
Thanks a lot Stephen. Effectively, that's not at all what I was remembering
(which was rather "picture-centric"), but that is also very helpful.
I'll keep on mining the list archives until I find it or someone remembers.
Cheers,
-- Éric
On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:45 PM, Stephen Bloch wrote:
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
