Re: [racket] requiring in multiple phases

2012-05-21 Thread Matthew Flatt
I think there probably should not be a standard shortcut. You may well have a good reason for to import a module into multiple phases, but I think it usually indicates a code-organization problem (where code that needs to live at different phases has been lumped together at some level). Since it's

Re: [racket] requiring in multiple phases

2012-05-21 Thread Neil Van Dyke
I'm wondering whether there's a standard shortcut, and, if not, whether there should be. (I am pretty deep into macrology right now, hence the question. :) Jon Rafkind wrote at 05/21/2012 02:28 PM: (define-syntax-rule (require-for-all req ...) (require (for-meta -1 req ...) (for-meta 0 req ..

Re: [racket] requiring in multiple phases

2012-05-21 Thread Jon Rafkind
(define-syntax-rule (require-for-all req ...) (require (for-meta -1 req ...) (for-meta 0 req ...) (for-meta 1 req ...)) (require-for-all "a.rkt" "b.rkt" "c.rkt") should work afaik On 05/21/2012 11:39 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > If I want to "require" a module for multiple phases, is there a short