Why not turn on Emacs bindings inside of DrRacket?
On Aug 8, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Daniel Bastos wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
> Warning: you switched from a teaching language to full Racket.
> The former would have caught this mistake, which is why we
> de
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
> Warning: you switched from a teaching language to full Racket.
> The former would have caught this mistake, which is why we
> designed them for HtDP. Racket is for grown-up parenthesis
> eaters -- who want the behavior of cond that you j
Thanks for pointing this out.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
> Warning: you switched from a teaching language to full Racket.
> The former would have caught this mistake, which is why we
> designed them for HtDP. Racket is for grown-up parenthesis
> eaters -- who want
Warning: you switched from a teaching language to full Racket.
The former would have caught this mistake, which is why we
designed them for HtDP. Racket is for grown-up parenthesis
eaters -- who want the behavior of cond that you just experienced,
or so I am told. -- Matthias
On Aug 5, 2
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard
wrote:
> What happens in create-bst-word, when the word to inserted is the same
> as (node-word bst) ?
Aha! I see. It returns void because there is no case for when the string is
equal.
> (void? (create-bst-word (create-bst-word false "dan") "d
What happens in create-bst-word, when the word to inserted is the same
as (node-word bst) ?
/Jens Axel
2014-08-05 21:56 GMT+02:00 Daniel Bastos :
> After studying chapter 14 of HtDP, I decided to try putting strings into a
> BST. The code below works with a few strings. I have a file with 22064
6 matches
Mail list logo
