Re: [racket] memory issues

2011-11-20 Thread Eric Tanter
On Nov 20, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > There are lots of caches at all layers of DrRacket down to Racket for > lots of different purposes. We try to keep them leak-free but it can > be hard to track down these bugs. I understand! let me know if I can help somehow (eg. running an instr

Re: [racket] memory issues

2011-11-20 Thread Robby Findler
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Eric Tanter wrote: > New numbers with a fresh install of 5.2: > > starts 200MB > open 5 buffers 230MB > first scribble 300MB > compile all buffers 450MB > recompile first 530MB > all again 580MB > all again 650MB > all again 620MB > all again 680MB > all again 700M

Re: [racket] memory issues

2011-11-20 Thread Eric Tanter
New numbers with a fresh install of 5.2: starts 200MB open 5 buffers 230MB first scribble 300MB compile all buffers 450MB recompile first 530MB all again 580MB all again 650MB all again 620MB all again 680MB all again 700MB all again 720MB all again 660MB all again 690MB all again 710MB Interesti

Re: [racket] memory issues

2011-11-20 Thread Eric Tanter
No, it's off. I turned it on several days ago to try, but had some issues so switched it off. -- Éric On Nov 20, 2011, at 0:56, Robby Findler wrote: > Do you have online check syntax turned on? It uses more memory. > > Robby > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Eric Tanter wrote: >> Hi, >>

Re: [racket] memory issues

2011-11-19 Thread Robby Findler
Do you have online check syntax turned on? It uses more memory. Robby On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Eric Tanter wrote: > Hi, > > I have noticed a quite serious problem with memory usage lately. > > Basically, I've been spending my time the last two days with 5 scribble files > open, compilin