At Tue, 24 May 2011 12:33:47 +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
> > From a Racket implementor's perspective, the BSD side has it right.
> > It's not just subroutines within Racket, but different threads within a
> > single Racket process that might compete for a file lock; when a thread
> > fails to obtain a
On 24/05/11 03:28, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Mon, 23 May 2011 12:52:12 +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
Solaris seems to take quite a dim view of flock(); from man flock():
That's nothing compared to the dim view of F_SETLK in the BSD world.
Ooh... this sounds like it could get religious!
From a Rac
At Mon, 23 May 2011 12:52:12 +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
> My never ending battle to get racket to play nice with Solaris continues:
> [...]
> STREAMS and STREAM fds on Solaris use fcntl(F_GETLK/F_SETLK, F_SETLKW)
> and their 64-bit counterparts F_GETLK64 etc. However, these need a pointer
> to a lock
3 matches
Mail list logo
