Re: [racket] confusing graphics primitives in 2htdp/image

2010-06-25 Thread Robby Findler
Pinholes are planned to return, indeed. But they will not return in the way that they once were there. That is, they will be a more advanced feature and will only come in if you explicitly start using them (details forthcoming). Robby On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Paul Ojanen wrote: > I got t

Re: [racket] confusing graphics primitives in 2htdp/image

2010-06-25 Thread Paul Ojanen
I got the impression from past discussions that pinholes would return. _ From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Bloch Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:13 AM To: PLT-Scheme Mailing List Subject: [racket] confusing graphics primitive

Re: [racket] confusing graphics primitives in 2htdp/image

2010-06-25 Thread Matthias Felleisen
The names were chosen for backwards compatibility. -- Matthias On Jun 25, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Stephen Bloch wrote: > There are a whole lot of graphics operations in 2htdp/image, and many of them > come in pairs: overlay/xy and place-image, add-line and scene+line, add-curve > and scene+curve,