Harry Spier wrote at 02/08/2012 10:45 PM:
Neil wrote:
You could do it by hand, using reading primitives ...
Do you mean by creating a new readtable?
I wasn't clear. I meant things like "read-char".
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
Racket Users list:
http://lis
Thanks Neil, Sam and Matthias
You guys are great.
Matthias wrote:
> 2. I ran this stupid little program below. The timing for a file of 19990186
> chars over 9896 lines, with 9922 occurrences of "abc" clocks in like this:
>
> cpu time: 4570 real time: 4629 gc time: 2164
>
> How much too slow is t
1. I am surprised that regexp-replace* does not work on input-ports like all
other regexp- functions. I assume Matthew has a rationale but my quick look
didn't discover it in the docs.
2. I ran this stupid little program below. The timing for a file of 19990186
chars over 9896 lines, with 992
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Harry Spier wrote:
>
> I'd like to convert these programs to Racket, but using regular
> expressions might be too slow.
I find that my intuitions about what might or might not be too slow
are usually wrong. Have you tried measuring this?
--
sam th
sa...@ccs.neu.e
Harry Spier wrote at 02/07/2012 08:05 PM:
I have Python programs which convert Indian language book length
etexts from one transliteration scheme to another so I'm calling the
Python replace function hundreds of thousands of times per e-text and
doing multiple replaces with each call.
What
5 matches
Mail list logo
