Re: [racket] Web Application Deployment

2010-06-25 Thread John Clements
On Jun 23, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Ken Struys wrote: > Oops forgot the link: http://pandela.com/ FWIW dep't.: Linode ($20/month) sounds better than this (16 GB, 512 MB ram, etc.). John Clements smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___

Re: [racket] Web Application Deployment

2010-06-23 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote at 06/23/2010 02:35 PM: On 23.06.10 00:10, synx wrote: I looked over the FastCGI and SCGI protocols, and concluded that they weren't much more efficient than a protocol known as HTTP. Why not proxy your data to a webserver, using apache's proxy module? I recently looked

Re: [racket] Web Application Deployment

2010-06-23 Thread Jakub Piotr Cłapa
On 23.06.10 00:10, synx wrote: I looked over the FastCGI and SCGI protocols, and concluded that they weren't much more efficient than a protocol known as HTTP. Why not proxy your data to a webserver, using apache's proxy module? I recently looked at FastCGI and came to the same conclusion. To b

Re: [racket] Web Application Deployment

2010-06-23 Thread Ken Struys
Oops forgot the link: http://pandela.com/ On Wed, 06/23/2010 at 10:32am, "Ken Struys" wrote: > I use this company for VPS (Virtual Private Server) hosting. It's similar to > the service EC2 provides, but it's only $17 a month. > > You get: > - Any almost any OS you would want > - root access to

Re: [racket] Web Application Deployment

2010-06-23 Thread Ken Struys
I use this company for VPS (Virtual Private Server) hosting. It's similar to the service EC2 provides, but it's only $17 a month. You get: - Any almost any OS you would want - root access to your vm (install whatever you want) - a dedicated IP - 256MB Ram - 200GB/month in bandwidth - 5GB disk sp

Re: [racket] Web Application Deployment

2010-06-22 Thread synx
I looked over the FastCGI and SCGI protocols, and concluded that they weren't much more efficient than a protocol known as HTTP. Why not proxy your data to a webserver, using apache's proxy module? My apache2.conf has a lot of these in it: ProxyPass http://127.0.0.1:/ retry=10 If

Re: [racket] Web Application Deployment

2010-06-22 Thread Anton van Straaten
Karl Winterling wrote: I'm a college student in California, so I can't afford a World of Warcraft account. However, I might try to design and "sell" a Racket application to my Co-op. so I'll need to avoid sounding mentally disturbed to the central IT staff. Be aware that IT staff might be a bit

Re: [racket] Web Application Deployment

2010-06-22 Thread Matthias Felleisen
Go for the CGI library then, it works well and patches are welcome On Jun 22, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Karl Winterling wrote: I'm a college student in California, so I can't afford a World of Warcraft account. However, I might try to design and "sell" a Racket application to my Co-op. so I'll need t

Re: [racket] Web Application Deployment

2010-06-22 Thread Karl Winterling
I'm a college student in California, so I can't afford a World of Warcraft account. However, I might try to design and "sell" a Racket application to my Co-op. so I'll need to avoid sounding mentally disturbed to the central IT staff. On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > Racke

Re: [racket] Web Application Deployment

2010-06-22 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Racket comes with a CGI library. I recently ported a large legacy Racket (PLT Scheme) CGI-based application to SCGI using "http://www.neilvandyke.org/scgi-scheme/";. For new development, consider using the PLT Web Server instead of SCGI or old CGI. Nowadays, virtual servers like Amazon EC2 a