[Late reply.]
On January 23rd, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2014, at 2:38 AM, Patrick Useldinger wrote:
>
> > 2) My (unqualified) first impression is that the OOP layer in
> >Swindle is way more powerful than the "standard" OOP layer in
> >Racket. Is there a reason why Swindl
On Jan 23, 2014, at 2:38 AM, Patrick Useldinger wrote:
> 2) My (unqualified) first impression is that the OOP layer in Swindle is way
> more powerful than the "standard" OOP layer in Racket. Is there a reason why
> Swindle has not become the standard OOP layer in Racket?
Racket, at the time PL
2 matches
Mail list logo
