5 hours ago, David Vanderson wrote:
>(define (path . body) (b (tt "\"" body "\"")))
>
> and with scribble syntax:
>
>(define @pa...@body} @b...@tt{"@body"}})
>
>
> Question on scribble syntax: isn't @pa...@body} read as (path body)?
No -- the whole point is to read the part in the brac
(define (path . body) (b (tt "\"" body "\"")))
and with scribble syntax:
(define @pa...@body} @b...@tt{"@body"}})
Question on scribble syntax: isn't @pa...@body} read as (path body) ?
What syntax gives (path . body) ? I'm having trouble getting a . in there.
Thanks,
Dave
On 10/01/201
Three minutes ago, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> I meant the @ syntax just like your example, but I was thinking of
> the @syntax being entered by the user via the browser
That's a really good idea, and if you do that we can definitely use
it. We've been looking for a while for some wiki solution
I meant the @ syntax just like your example, but I was thinking of the
@syntax being entered by the user via the browser
In 'continue' roughly (make-post "First Post" "@p{Hello @bold{World}} ")
What do you think?
Stephen
(define (show-help req)
`(html
(head (title "DrDr > Help")
When you say "use Scribble" I presume you mean generate HTML like
Scribble does? If so, you're right that it is designed for batch
processing. I'm not sure it would be very useful to have it
dynamically served because it is designed for a consistent, designed,
structure.
If what you mean is "use t
5 matches
Mail list logo
