Thanks Matthew and Robby! I'll give the self-pipe trick a try.
Regards,
Tony
On 12/21/2014 09:01 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> You're right that can't post to a Racket semaphore in a signal handler.
>
> The way to allocate a global and make it available to Racket code is to
> create a new kind of
You're right that can't post to a Racket semaphore in a signal handler.
The way to allocate a global and make it available to Racket code is to
create a new kind of event; the 2006 post is still accurate. In
particular, the new event's polling function (which is called by the
scheduler) can check
I don't know myself, but control-c raises an exception from an
OS-level signal handler and so probably you'll have to make a similar
bridge and that code might be worth looking at.
Robby
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If I wanted to catch a Unix signal
3 matches
Mail list logo
