No problem, I'm sure this will get resolved at some point. Incidentally, I
made some changes to the file (added some additional tests) and have not
seen the issue - even though I tried about 10 times to make it happen.
When I have time, I will go back to the earlier version of the file and
try it
Oh, I recall that thread. That makes it sound like a problem at a lower
layer where my suggestion won't help.
Thanks (and sorry),
Robby
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, Joe Gilray wrote:
> Robby, Please look at this thread:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/users@racket-lang.org/msg16636.html
>
> Thank
Robby, Please look at this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@racket-lang.org/msg16636.html
Thanks,
-Joe
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Joe Gilray wrote:
> Yes, Good Idea, stay tuned... I will see if I can make it happen.
>
> -Joe
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Robby Findler
Yes, Good Idea, stay tuned... I will see if I can make it happen.
-Joe
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Do you have the ability to run DrRacket from the command line? If so, it
> may be a useful clue if you were to type control-c at the prompt after it
> gets good and hun
Do you have the ability to run DrRacket from the command line? If so, it
may be a useful clue if you were to type control-c at the prompt after it
gets good and hung. There is some chance that that will print out some
context information about an infinite loop that DrRacket has fallen into
and that
No, never seems to come back, but I will wait longer next time.
No, no typing and the file works as it is about 75% of the time.
BTW, this happened on 5.3.4 and 5.3.3, but less often
-joe
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Does it eventually come back?
>
> You don't, by a
Does it eventually come back?
You don't, by any chance, type a ] with either alt-gr down or with some
other modifier?
Robby
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Joe Gilray wrote:
> FYI, I've been getting DrRacket "not responding"s quite a bit on both
> 64-bit and 32-bit 5.3.5 installations on Win
FYI, I've been getting DrRacket "not responding"s quite a bit on both
64-bit and 32-bit 5.3.5 installations on Windows 7. It happens right away
about 25% of the time that I bring up DrRacket on a 3300 line file. It
seems to get about through parsing the file when I get the "not responding"
messag
The sources are supplied so that you can experiment with the code i the book
w/o having to type it in and/or copy/paste it from some e-book format. Open,
edit, run. And save it somewhere else. -- Matthias
On Jun 21, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Joe Gilray wrote:
> How does one use the code in the "re
How does one use the code in the "realm" collection?
It is through (require ...) or just by copying the source?
thanks,
-joe
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Racket version 5.3.5 is now available from
>
> http://racket-lang.org/
>
> This is a special-purpose release
You can also use the PPA. It builds the 32-bit and 64-bit packages.
$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:plt/racket
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get install racket
and you get notified of updates automagically!
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 50 minutes ago, Joe Python wro
50 minutes ago, Joe Python wrote:
>
>
> The version of racket for Ubuntu precise is actually a 64-bit package.
>
> [...]
>
*sigh* Yes, I forgot that the machine that does the ubuntu build was
also physically upgraded to x86_64.
I'll change the file name. (Meanwhile, the only 32 bit build fo
The version of racket for Ubuntu precise is actually a 64-bit package.
*Package*: Racket*Version*: 5.3.5 (June 2013)*Platform*: Linux i386 (Ubuntu
precise)*Type*: Self-extracting shell script*File*:
racket-5.3.5-bin-i386-linux-ubuntu-precise.sh*Size*: 78MDownload links:
(Choose the nearest site)
13 matches
Mail list logo
