Re: [racket] Order of executing required modules

d...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robby Findler > Sent: 05 April 2011 17:21 > To: Jos Koot > Cc: users > Subject: Re: [racket] Order of executing required modules > > FWIW, you also have to make sure that any module that requires your > test module does not also require one of the su

Re: [racket] Order of executing required modules

l.com >> [mailto:robby.find...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robby Findler >> Sent: 05 April 2011 16:57 >> To: Jos Koot >> Cc: users >> Subject: Re: [racket] Order of executing required modules >> >> I don't think that there is any particular reason for that s

Re: [racket] Order of executing required modules

@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robby Findler > Sent: 05 April 2011 16:57 > To: Jos Koot > Cc: users > Subject: Re: [racket] Order of executing required modules > > I don't think that there is any particular reason for that specific > order, but there is a reason not to rely on an

Re: [racket] Order of executing required modules

I don't think that there is any particular reason for that specific order, but there is a reason not to rely on any order. Specifically, if you ever get one of those other files requiring each other, then this will disrupt the order you see. For example, if both test-a.rkt and test-z.rkt require te