John Clements wrote on 12/10/2014 02:56 PM:
Possibly related: the last time I checked, there was no widely adopted
schema system for JSON, which is completely appalling. That is, it’s
not possible to document an HTTP call as “returning a JSON object with
field “timestamp” which is an integer an
Possibly related: the last time I checked, there was no widely adopted
schema system for JSON, which is completely appalling. That is, it’s not
possible to document an HTTP call as “returning a JSON object with field
“timestamp” which is an integer and “value” which is a string and no other
fields
On Dec 6, 2014, at 1:08 AM, Alexis King wrote:
>> It doesn’t have to be a struct, but the problem is that typed racket doesn’t
>> know that a value of type String for instance will be of type JSExpr or not,
>> so you would have to put (assert x jsexpr?) around everything that you want
>> to tr
> It doesn’t have to be a struct, but the problem is that typed racket doesn’t
> know that a value of type String for instance will be of type JSExpr or not,
> so you would have to put (assert x jsexpr?) around everything that you want
> to treat as a jsexpr.
Ah, that’s interesting. I’d seen as
On Dec 5, 2014, at 11:30 PM, Alexis King wrote:
> I’ve been having an issue figuring out how to properly use the json library
> in typed racket, so I posted a question about it on SO. Any help would be
> greatly appreciated!
>
> Racket Users list:
> http://lists.racket-l
5 matches
Mail list logo
