At Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:58:58 +0100, Marijn wrote:
> I do wonder why I couldn't reproduce on my own x86_64 system. Should I
> have tried racket instead of DrRacket
Yes, that could make the difference. Assuming that you have debugging
enabled, DrRacket's debugging instrumentation could disable the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-01-12 05:57, Erik Dominikus wrote:
> Only 3 hours from report to fix. That's quite impressive. :-D
>
> @Marijn: I forgot... my platform is Ubuntu 10.04 Linux 2.6.32-38
> x86_64. Still learning to write bug reports I guess. :-|
You're doing fine
Only 3 hours from report to fix. That's quite impressive. :-D
@Marijn: I forgot... my platform is Ubuntu 10.04 Linux 2.6.32-38 x86_64.
Still learning to write bug reports I guess. :-|
Once again, thanks!
~ sorry if the response seems to be coming at a weird time; I'm on the
other side of the wo
The bug turned out to be in the bytecode compiler, which in some cases
could lose track of the fact that a variable captured by a closure has
a flonum value. The lost information was needed only by the JIT, but
compiling your example to bytecode and attempting to load it would
also provoke an error
I can replicate the error in my build, and I'm working on it.
At Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:57:32 +0100, Marijn wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 30-01-12 15:21, Erik Dominikus wrote:
> > Source code for reproducing attached. 'racket --version' shows
> > 5.2. I built from s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-01-12 15:21, Erik Dominikus wrote:
> Source code for reproducing attached. 'racket --version' shows
> 5.2. I built from source.
>
> The expected result is a list, but Racket gave this error message
> instead:
>
>
> internal error: flonum posi
6 matches
Mail list logo
