Yes that is my understanding.
On 01/17/2012 01:43 AM, Veer Singh wrote:
> Thanks , I think I understand it now , so roughly following steps
> happens(apology for incorrect terminology) :
>
> 1. bind the identifier 'phases' to some val(a syntax transformer) in phase 1
>
> i) during the above
Thanks , I think I understand it now , so roughly following steps
happens(apology for incorrect terminology) :
1. bind the identifier 'phases' to some val(a syntax transformer) in phase 1
i) during the above step id 'phase2' is bound to some val i.e syntax
transformer in phase 2
ii) (p
I'm guessing a little bit but I think its because the `phases' macro is
expanded at phase 2 before `set-compile' is called. If you put (set-compile)
before the definition of `phases' then you get '(1 2).
On 01/17/2012 12:06 AM, Veer Singh wrote:
>
> Why macro call (phases) produces '(1 0) and no
3 matches
Mail list logo
