I predict a thread on the dev list (everyone welcome) later today...
On May 20, 2013, at 8:01 AM, Ray Racine wrote:
> What is the roadmap with min-Racket? Here I'm assuming min-Racket as the
> eventual official core racket release and everything else a layered add-on
> via the package mana
What is the roadmap with min-Racket? Here I'm assuming min-Racket as the
eventual official core racket release and everything else a layered add-on
via the package management system, Planet(N) et al. Which is something I'd
very much like to see as a direction.
FWIW, I would remove json and db f
You could also try
https://github.com/mflatt/min-racket
At Sun, 19 May 2013 11:19:30 -0600, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> I think most of the graphical stuff should be loaded at runtime, and you
> should not need those libraries just to compile racket.
>
> On 05/19/2013 11:16 AM, Nathan Campos wrote:
Racket doesn't have any specific dependency on FLTK -- it uses GTK,
but only at runtime. Can you post the exact output from `configure`?
Sam
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Nathan Campos wrote:
> Strange, I haven't received your reply in my email, Jon. Anyway, I've tried
> compiling it before.
Strange, I haven't received your reply in my email, Jon. Anyway, I've tried
compiling it before. It asks for FLTK in the configure stage.
*Nathan Campos*
http://about.me/nathanpc
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Nathan Campos wrote:
> Hello,
> I was thinking about using Racket in my HP Jorn
I think most of the graphical stuff should be loaded at runtime, and you should
not need those libraries just to compile racket.
On 05/19/2013 11:16 AM, Nathan Campos wrote:
> Hello,
> I was thinking about using Racket in my HP Jornada 720 (running Linux of
> course) just for fun, since it's
6 matches
Mail list logo
