8 minutes ago, Danny Yoo wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> > I tried:
> >
> > #lang slideshow
> >
> > @slide[
> > @t{Blah blah}]
>
> Try:
>
> ;;;
> #lang at-exp slideshow
> @slide[@t{Blah blah}]
> ;;;
>
I think you want to read the scribble documentation for the scribble
reader (which is where the @s come from: they are another notation for
sexps; @slide[stuff] is the same as (slide stuff), for example).
Robby
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> I tried:
>
> #lang slideshow
>
>
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> I tried:
>
> #lang slideshow
>
> @slide[
> @t{Blah blah}]
Try:
;;;
#lang at-exp slideshow
@slide[@t{Blah blah}]
;;;
The "@" feature is enabled by the use of the 'at-exp' in the
I tried:
#lang slideshow
@slide[
@t{Blah blah}]
but that gives me:
compile: unbound identifier in module in: @slide
Can you point me to the documentation for this syntax?
(@slide does not give any result in the Help desk search)
Thanks,
-- Éric
On Jul 1, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Eli Barzilay wro
It doesn't -- like I said, it's a side-comment that makes life easier
for writing slides (and one that is easy to miss).
11 hours ago, Eric Tanter wrote:
> Thanks Eli, though that does not fix the two bugs I described.
>
> -- Éric
>
>
> On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> >
Hi Matthew,
> The problem in your initial message isn't really specific to comments.
Good point, I didn't test it with non-comments...
> I had successfully ignored the problem for years, :) but now I've
> pushed a fix.
Thanks!
> The second comment-specific problem is also fixed, though it prob
The problem in your initial message isn't really specific to comments.
The `code' form also had trouble with
(code (a b
c) d)
moving the `d' to the next line --- but the problem mostly shows up
with comments.
I had successfully ignored the problem for years, :) but now I've
pushed a f
Thanks Eli, though that does not fix the two bugs I described.
-- Éric
On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 40 minutes ago, Eric Tanter wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> #lang racket
>> (require slideshow/code)
>>
>> (code
>> (λ (x) 1) (code:comment "1"))
>
> As a side note, the scribble
40 minutes ago, Eric Tanter wrote:
> [...]
>
> #lang racket
> (require slideshow/code)
>
> (code
> (λ (x) 1) (code:comment "1"))
As a side note, the scribble syntax is very useful in slideshow too.
You could get it with something like this:
#lang at-exp racket
(require slideshow/code)
To add to the strangeness, if one tries the following:
(code
(λ (x)
1 (code:comment "1")
))
Then the output is not well-formed:
(λ (x)
1 ; 1
-- Éric
On Jun 30, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is something strange with the way comments are rendered.
>
> Conside
10 matches
Mail list logo
