> I think you're right. My application is the replacement tool for McFly, and
> I want to eliminate the need for distributed packages to need a package
> dependency like on `mcfly-runtime`.
Maybe you don't need to eliminate that? It would only be a build
dependency: A using package's info.rkt wou
I was hoping you'd chime in, Eli.
> > (match stx-or-sepxr
> > [(? syntax? stx) (print/at-exp (syntax->datum stx))]
> That's a major mistake!
Well, syntax->datum usually is. :) But the usual reason why it's a
mistake, seemed N/A here, to produce a plain text .scrbl file. Thanks
for pointing
Eli Barzilay wrote on 10/04/2015 03:06 AM:
The *reader* ignores uniform indentation, so when you write something
like:
That's what I was remembering. Thanks.
Right -- that was the reason for my comment: maybe there's some way to
keep the source code where it is, and refer to it from the file
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Thanks, Eli. That's one of the things I was afraid of.
>
> The other thing is: does a Scribble formatter ever look at the
> line/column position information in the syntax objects? (I thought I
> recalled it seeming to do this years ago, mayb
Thanks, Eli. That's one of the things I was afraid of.
The other thing is: does a Scribble formatter ever look at the
line/column position information in the syntax objects? (I thought I
recalled it seeming to do this years ago, maybe for the start of a
multi-line verbatim-like markup.)
I
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Greg Hendershott
wrote:
> So a kind of pretty-printing for at-expressions?
>
> I'm not aware of an existing procedure to do this.
When I wrote about the reader implementation, I did it with a cute hack
that:
* Uses backslash as the command character instead of @
Thanks, Greg.
Greg Hendershott wrote on 09/30/2015 01:54 PM:
I'm not aware of an existing procedure to do this.
It has some interesting wrinkles. Following is my "Greenspun's Tenth
Rule" version.
[...]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users
So a kind of pretty-printing for at-expressions?
I'm not aware of an existing procedure to do this.
It has some interesting wrinkles. Following is my "Greenspun's Tenth
Rule" version. (An ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow
implementation of half of what's probably needed.)
I've comme
Clarification: The goal is to write a Scribble file, in @-syntax, so
that it looks much like a human would write, with the at-signs and
(ideally) curly braces.
The input to this writing would be a tree of syntax objects.
Neil Van Dyke wrote on 09/30/2015 06:25 AM:
Is there already a way to pr
Is there already a way to programmatically write syntax objects using
@-syntax, such that the output could be read with the @-reader?
I want to write a `.scrbl` file in @-syntax, from syntax objects that
mostly came from `scribble/reader` `read-syntax-inside`.
Neil V.
--
You received this me
10 matches
Mail list logo
