On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:07 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
wrote:
>
>> On May 16, 2017, at 11:26 AM, Robby Findler
>> wrote:
>>
>> If you have control of the language<%> class, then you can do that via
>> the on-execute method. If you want to do that for all languages (which
>> is probabl
> On May 16, 2017, at 11:26 AM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>
> If you have control of the language<%> class, then you can do that via
> the on-execute method. If you want to do that for all languages (which
> is probably not a good idea, but you could use this approach and limit
> it to a known set
> On May 16, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Vincent St-Amour
> wrote:
>
> John, Austin,
>
> You can use loggers for this. The `data` argument to `log-message`
> allows payloads to be carried along with log messages. Just have the
> user program log messages with a particular topic, and have the tool
> lis
If you have control of the language<%> class, then you can do that via
the on-execute method. If you want to do that for all languages (which
is probably not a good idea, but you could use this approach and limit
it to a known set of languages), you could override the on-execute
method of the rep<%
John, Austin,
You can use loggers for this. The `data` argument to `log-message`
allows payloads to be carried along with log messages. Just have the
user program log messages with a particular topic, and have the tool
listen on that topic.
That's how the optimization coach (which is a DrRacket t
Austin Sparks (cc:ed) and I are struggling with what I believe should be a
pretty simple problem; how can we share a value between a DrRacket tool and a
user’s program? Specifically, the value in question here is a channel (probably
an asynchronous channel) on which the user’s thread can place
6 matches
Mail list logo
