RE: [racket-users] racket versus racket/base

Thanks. Your answer clarifies my brain. Jos _ From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Alexander D. Knauth Sent: sábado, 23 de mayo de 2015 20:06 To: Jos Koot Cc: Racket-Users List Subject: Re: [racket-users] racket versus racket/base It

Re: [racket-users] racket versus racket/base

It sounds to me like you're understanding this perfectly. racket provides all of racket/base for-syntax. On May 23, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Jos Koot wrote: > This works: > > #lang racket > (define-syntax (x y) (syntax-case y () (_ (syntax (quote monkey) > x ; -> monkey > > This does not work >

[racket-users] racket versus racket/base

This works: #lang racket (define-syntax (x y) (syntax-case y () (_ (syntax (quote monkey) x ; -> monkey This does not work #lang racket/base (define-syntax (x y) (syntax-case y () (_ (syntax (quote monkey) gives the expansion time error: syntax-case: unbound identifier in the tran