On 2/2/2019 10:04 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Sat, 2 Feb 2019 10:04:04 +0100, Gour wrote:
> Leaving aside other language features' pros/cons, I was a bit surprised
> when someone in Julia's channel responded to me with: "Racket is pretty
> amazing, but I stopped looking into it after I figured,
At Sat, 2 Feb 2019 10:04:04 +0100, Gour wrote:
> Leaving aside other language features' pros/cons, I was a bit surprised
> when someone in Julia's channel responded to me with: "Racket is pretty
> amazing, but I stopped looking into it after I figured, that it can't
> really be made fast language..
Gour wrote on 2/2/19 4:04 AM:
I've to decide between Racket and Julia as language of choice for writing
desktop app. Racket's advantage is that its GUI support is provided out of the
box, while in Julia I'd probably have to use Gtk.jl as the best supported
package since I do not want to use El
Hello,
I've to decide between Racket and Julia as language of choice for writing
desktop app. Racket's advantage is that its GUI support is provided out of the
box, while in Julia I'd probably have to use Gtk.jl as the best supported
package since I do not want to use Electron or some other JS/br
4 matches
Mail list logo
