Hi George,
> [For those about to object: yes, Scheme has a formal denotational definition
> in contrast to the many languages that are operationally defined by
> (relatively) informal description of behavior combined with a "reference"
> implementation. Consider that Scheme's denotational spec i
Hi George, thanks for the reply!
I work a bit with hardware, but I'm not terribly good with assembly. I know
enough about hardware to know how hard this must be to get working - but it
does interest me a lot. The more I learn, the more respect I have for the
tools available.
I guess for self-host
On 11/24/2020 7:34 PM, Tim Meehan wrote:
Some Schemes allow you to compile to a (self-hosting?) executable
(Chicken {via C}, Chez, Racket, others?). Some do not (Guile,
others?), but compile to bytecode.
Why would a group of developers choose one over the other? Or is the
end result not that
Some Schemes allow you to compile to a (self-hosting?) executable (Chicken
{via C}, Chez, Racket, others?). Some do not (Guile, others?), but compile
to bytecode.
Why would a group of developers choose one over the other? Or is the end
result not that different in either case? Is there a book/pape
4 matches
Mail list logo
