> On Sep 7, 2016, at 1:02 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
> Isn't there also the option of using the aws pkg at the hash from before the
> change to v4?
Yes, definitely. (In fact, that’s what I wound up doing, after a git bisect.) I
might just fork and branch and submit it as a separate pkg
Isn't there also the option of using the aws pkg at the hash from before
the change to v4?
Sam
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:23 PM 'John Clements' via Racket Users <
racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 7, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones
> wrote:
> >
> > On 09/06/2016 02:40 PM, '
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
>
> On 09/06/2016 02:40 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote:
>> Obvious fixes that I don’t like:
>>
>> 1) stop using google cloud storage, starting using Amazon S3.
>> 2) use the old PLaneT version instead of the shiny new pkg vers
On 09/06/2016 02:40 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote:
> Obvious fixes that I don’t like:
>
> 1) stop using google cloud storage, starting using Amazon S3.
> 2) use the old PLaneT version instead of the shiny new pkg version.
>
> Any other suggestions?
3) maybe there's a "google API" f
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Greg Hendershott
> wrote:
>
> Until this thread today, I wasn't even aware the AWS package could be
> used with GCS.
>
> It was a fair amount of work to update things to use v4 sig a year ago:
>
> https://github.com/greghendershott/aws/milestone/5?closed=1
>
>
Until this thread today, I wasn't even aware the AWS package could be
used with GCS.
It was a fair amount of work to update things to use v4 sig a year ago:
https://github.com/greghendershott/aws/milestone/5?closed=1
If only I'd known, I could have used GCS compatibility as an excuse
not to do
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:59 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:40 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:19 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I’m in the process of updating some old code
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:40 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:19 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
>> wrote:
>>
>> I’m in the process of updating some old code that used the PLaneT version of
>> aws to communicate with google cloud storage (yes, g
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:19 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>
> I’m in the process of updating some old code that used the PLaneT version of
> aws to communicate with google cloud storage (yes, google cloud storage
> apparently uses the s3 protocol). Using the current aws package
I’m in the process of updating some old code that used the PLaneT version of
aws to communicate with google cloud storage (yes, google cloud storage
apparently uses the s3 protocol). Using the current aws package with Google
Cloud Storage yields responses looking like this:
root@cp-test-class:/
10 matches
Mail list logo
