>
> I left that out of the file so that it wouldn’t try to make a window
> appear if I just run raco test on everything or something like that, or if
> in the future I use Travis CI or something. But when I run the file in
> DrRacket, I type in (send frame show #t) to check it. But even without
>
On Apr 5, 2015, at 5:22 AM, Lux wrote:
>> Here it is, although some of the things I did like creating objects on a
>> dummy panel and then reparenting them seem like they could be bad ideas.
>> https://github.com/AlexKnauth/racket-gui-table
>
> Thanks, I've searched something like this for sev
Jens Axel Søgaard writes:
> Tree?
>
> Do you mean this?
>
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/mrlib/Hierarchical_List_Control.html?q=button%25
Hmm, there is no screenshot, but it could be that's it. Thank you!
Sincerely,
Gour
--
When your intelligence has passed out of the dense forest
of delusi
> Here it is, although some of the things I did like creating objects on a
> dummy panel and then reparenting them seem like they could be bad ideas.
> https://github.com/AlexKnauth/racket-gui-table
Thanks, I've searched something like this for several days, starred. Maybe
would be a good idea a
Tree?
Do you mean this?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/mrlib/Hierarchical_List_Control.html?q=button%25
/Jens Axel
2015-04-04 10:30 GMT+02:00 Gour :
>
> Alexander D. Knauth writes:
>
>> Here it is, although some of the things I did like creating objects on a
>> dummy panel and then reparenting t
Alexander D. Knauth writes:
> Here it is, although some of the things I did like creating objects on a
> dummy panel and then reparenting them seem like they could be bad ideas.
> https://github.com/AlexKnauth/racket-gui-table
Thank you. I did star it.
What about trees? You don't have need for
Alexander D. Knauth writes:
> For tables, I wrote my own version of some kind of table for racket’s gui
> so that I could use it in a gui latin dictionary I was making.
Thanks. Looks good.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
One is understood to be in full knowledge whose every endeavor
is devoid of desire
Vincent St-Amour writes:
> I have written GUI applications in Racket, .NET, Swing and tk, and
> Racket is the most pleasant by far, IMO.
I'm glad to hear it. Racket, as language, really looks beautiful - simple
syntax and powerful expressibility, afaict.
Do you find Racket's GUI sufficient for
At Fri, 03 Apr 2015 10:40:18 +0200,
Gour wrote:
> So, it looks, (almost) everything is there present in Racket, so I wonder
> whether you consider that writing desktop GUI app is suitable niche for
> Racket making one productive and still getting decent performance?
I have written GUI applications
On Apr 3, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2015, at 4:40 AM, Gour wrote:
>
>> I've found the following:
>>
>> "Sadly, RacketGUI lacks some advanced controls I often want:
>>
>> trees
>> tables containing controls in cells
>> However the list-box% control
On Apr 3, 2015, at 4:40 AM, Gour wrote:
> I've found the following:
>
> "Sadly, RacketGUI lacks some advanced controls I often want:
>
>trees
>tables containing controls in cells
>However the list-box% control supports cells that only contain text.
>tree-tables
> “
For tab
Hello,
my 1st post here...by 'accident' I stumbled upon Floss Weekly episode about
Racket, liked it, visited web sites, read few posts (Why Lisp? Why Racket? is
*very* inspirational), watched some RacketCon videos, skimmed over mailing
list archive...and now have a question.
For some time I am co
12 matches
Mail list logo
