Thanks! I've pushed those fixes too.
Robby
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Max New wrote:
> Makes sense to follow TeX.
>
> Why not make the same change for \phi, \vartheta, \varrho and \varpi ?
>
> \varsigma looks to be correct, most likely because some PL researchers
> actually use it :)
>
>
Makes sense to follow TeX.
Why not make the same change for \phi, \vartheta, \varrho and \varpi ?
\varsigma looks to be correct, most likely because some PL researchers
actually use it :)
-Max Stewart New
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Jens Axel kindly tracked down th
Jens Axel kindly tracked down this link:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/98013/varepsilon-vs-epsilon
and so I'm now planning to change how DrRacket treats \epsilon so that
it inserts ϵ instead of the "backwards 3" that it currently does.
Please let me know if that sounds wrong to you.
Here's a prototype: https://github.com/racket/scribble/pull/33
Vincent
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:28:27 -0600,
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Vincent St-Amour
> wrote:
> > I agree, any extension anyone makes should make it into scribble itself.
> >
> > The scenari
That reminds me:
In DrRacket \epsilon is displayed the same way \varepsilon is.
/Jens Axel
2016-03-09 23:55 GMT+01:00 Robby Findler :
> Scribble has a big table mapping unicode to latex commands. Maybe it
> needs another entry?
>
> Robby
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:07 PM, David Van Horn
>
Whoops left off the mailing list...
On March 10, 2016 at 2:48:49 PM, Scott Moore (sdmo...@fas.harvard.edu) wrote:
On March 10, 2016 at 2:41:53 PM, Leif Andersen (l...@leifandersen.net) wrote:
On the other hand, I'm all down for making a `literal` or `exact`
scribble form that spits out the litera
> Should that table be user-extensible?
Probably not. Ideally, the best thing to do would be to just fix
scribble so that
it actually properly compiles to latex rather than leaking it's abstractions.
Although that may be too hard to do. :(
On the other hand, I'm all down for making a `literal`
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Vincent St-Amour
wrote:
> I agree, any extension anyone makes should make it into scribble itself.
>
> The scenario I'm concerned about is: user needs an extra character, but
> can't update scribble. Or updating scribble would require updating the
> rest of Racket
Until we come up with a better solution, could you share a list of the
characters you'd like to use (bonus points for the corresponding LaTeX
commands!), so I can add them to Scribble's list?
Vincent
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:03:06 -0600,
David Van Horn wrote:
>
> I have some source code I'm tryin
They way I've worked around this in the past is to render the problematic
character as a Pict and then drop that Pict into the scribble document.
Doing that has some problems but it can service if you can't get the
character you want into scribble.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016, 9:19 AM Vincent St-Amour <
I agree, any extension anyone makes should make it into scribble itself.
The scenario I'm concerned about is: user needs an extra character, but
can't update scribble. Or updating scribble would require updating the
rest of Racket, which may not be what the user wants.
I guess with the split dist
I think any extension is one that all would want (although I am not sure)
and so maybe pull requests is a good way to extend it?
There is the issue of conflicting imports at the latex level tho, so maybe
it should be specifiable at the document level.
Robby
On Wednesday, March 9, 2016, Vincent S
Should that table be user-extensible?
Vincent
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 17:11:47 -0600,
Robby Findler wrote:
>
> I think that maybe you're thinking of something fancier than what's
> there. It just takes some (small) set of well-known unicode and has
> corresponding latex commands. Then, in the latex
I think that maybe you're thinking of something fancier than what's
there. It just takes some (small) set of well-known unicode and has
corresponding latex commands. Then, in the latex backend for scribble,
it looks up latex in that table and drops it in, if it finds it.
Robby
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016
> Scribble has a big table mapping unicode to latex commands. Maybe it
needs another entry?
Woah, does that actually work? I was under the impression there were
unicode characters that could combine other unicode characters.
(Although I'd love to be wrong about this. :) )
~Leif Andersen
On Wed
Scribble has a big table mapping unicode to latex commands. Maybe it
needs another entry?
Robby
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:07 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
> Yes, the problem then is the code font doesn't support that character
> so it doesn't show up.
>
> David
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:05 PM,
Yes, the problem then is the code font doesn't support that character
so it doesn't show up.
David
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Leif Andersen wrote:
> Have you tried running the outputted tex file in xetex rather than pdflatex?
>
> ~Leif Andersen
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David V
Have you tried running the outputted tex file in xetex rather than pdflatex?
~Leif Andersen
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
> I have some source code I'm trying to typeset in a racketblock that
> uses subscript characters like ₀. This breaks when it gets to latex.
> Is th
I have some source code I'm trying to typeset in a racketblock that
uses subscript characters like ₀. This breaks when it gets to latex.
Is there some workaround to generate latex friendly output?
Thanks,
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racke
19 matches
Mail list logo
