On Saturday, December 5, 2015 at 12:36:50 PM UTC-5, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2015-12-05 09:25:59 -0800, brendan wrote:
> > Thanks Asumu. Yeah, I'm familiar with the binding concept.
>
> Ah, my apologies for overexplaining then. :)
Not at all! When it comes to the syntax and evaluation models I
On 2015-12-05 09:25:59 -0800, brendan wrote:
> Thanks Asumu. Yeah, I'm familiar with the binding concept.
Ah, my apologies for overexplaining then. :)
> I guess "free"
> means relative to some local expression context rather than in general, and
> that wasn't clear to me. But then a completely fr
Thanks Asumu. Yeah, I'm familiar with the binding concept. I guess "free" means
relative to some local expression context rather than in general, and that
wasn't clear to me. But then a completely free identifier is an error, so maybe
it should be clear. :)
--
You received this message because
On 2015-12-04 08:02:40 -0800, brendan wrote:
> ...Y'know, let me concentrated my obvious noobness in one post :) and ask a
> silly question: why is "free-identifier=?" so named? It compares identifier
> bindings, which obviously implies that the identifiers are not "free" at all.
> I only got the h
I was messing around in DrRacket and started writing a macro. When I finished
the first draft it gave me an error message saying that I can't use the _
wildcard in an expression context. I figured I had misremembered the format so
I went to the syntax-parse docs... well, to shorten the story I h
5 matches
Mail list logo
