Updated MetaPict today in order to fix missing exports from node.rkt.
The following example now produces this picture:
https://imgur.com/a/AYTz7
The parameters to control the shape of the arrow is explained here:
http://www.ntg.nl/maps/36/19.pdf
but the default arrow looks fine.
#lang
You might be interested in some of the line-drawing/edge-finding code
here: https://github.com/samth/edinburgh-2017/blob/edinburgh-2017/lib.rkt#L144
Sam
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
> As promised, I mocked up my original vs a quick iteration using pict.
> It's not
As promised, I mocked up my original vs a quick iteration using pict.
It's not nearly as time consuming as I thought it'd be (took about 30
minutes not being familiar with the pict api):
https://gist.github.com/apg/e193b3f4b1626397ebb3065947a6ae8a
It's obviously not visually the same, but the sam
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz
wrote:
> Are you focused more on replacing Graphviz, or a generalized drawing
> and visualization library that could be used to more easily put
> together a Graphviz like tool? I guess they are likely somewhat
> similar goals...
Firstly, I ju
There are a few tree layout algorithms implemented in
pict/tree-layout: http://docs.racket-lang.org/pict/Tree_Layout.html
Robby
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Prager
wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> I did commercial work on mind-map like tools in the 2000's, and have a soft
> spot for graph and
Hi Andrew
I did commercial work on mind-map like tools in the 2000's, and have a soft
spot for graph and tree visualisation.
Example: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/221249211_fig1_Fig-1-
Example-hi-tree-laid-out-in-the-standard-layout-style-It-shows-the-logical
I didn't work on the deep lay
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard
wrote:
> 2017-08-18 12:10 GMT+02:00 Andrew Gwozdziewycz :
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've been using graphviz for years for basic network architecture
>> diagrams and things, mostly to avoid answering the question of "which
>> annoying tool should I us
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 7:10 AM, David Storrs wrote:
> It sounds like an interesting and useful project. What would you want this
> solution to do, exactly?
The last public hack job I did using graphviz is something like this:
https://heroku-blog-files.s3.amazonaws.com/posts/1488278436-new-arch
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 6:21 AM, WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju
wrote:
> I have been working on it, but at very beginning stage and no working code
> right now.
Are you focused more on replacing Graphviz, or a generalized drawing
and visualization library that could be used to more easily put
together a Gra
2017-08-18 12:10 GMT+02:00 Andrew Gwozdziewycz :
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been using graphviz for years for basic network architecture
> diagrams and things, mostly to avoid answering the question of "which
> annoying tool should I use?" Graphviz has limitations for the type of
> stuff I use it for, b
It sounds like an interesting and useful project. What would you want this
solution to do, exactly?
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been using graphviz for years for basic network architecture
> diagrams and things, mostly to avoid answering the
I have been working on it, but at very beginning stage and no working code
right now.
The official website of Graphviz provides lots of papers on the underlying
algorithms,
I also found *Handbook of Graph Drawing and Visualization *is worth reading.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Andrew Gwozdz
Hi folks,
I've been using graphviz for years for basic network architecture
diagrams and things, mostly to avoid answering the question of "which
annoying tool should I use?" Graphviz has limitations for the type of
stuff I use it for, but I settle for it anyway, since it's a lot less
frustrating
13 matches
Mail list logo
