Re: [racket-users] Reflecting on context arity

2020-03-28 Thread Laurent
Follow up on Ben's idea: Take n as an optional argument, init value #f. On first application of f on the first values, continue n-map with n=received number of values. Once arrived at the empty lists you know how many values you should have. At each iteration, you can even check that the number of

Re: [racket-users] Reflecting on context arity

2020-03-27 Thread Ben Greenman
procedure-result-arity is very limited if you can find a way to call `f` once, though, you could assume that its result arity never changes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[racket-users] Reflecting on context arity

2020-03-27 Thread William J. Bowman
I'm trying to write a generalization of map that supports multiple return values: (define (map-n n f ls . lss) (if (empty? ls) (apply values (build-list n (lambda _ '( (call-with-values (thunk (apply f (car ls) (map car lss))) (lambda vs (call-with-values