[racket-users] RE: empty lines in a grammer of defform of scribble

2017-03-28 Thread Jos Koot
Option 3 works very fine. I have incorporated it in https://github.com/joskoot/turing. Looks very good. Thanks again, Jos -Original Message- From: Dupéron Georges [mailto:jahvascriptman...@gmail.com] Sent: martes, 28 de marzo de 2017 15:13 To: Racket Users Cc: jos.k...@gmail.com Subject:

[racket-users] RE: empty lines in a grammer of defform of scribble

2017-03-28 Thread Jos Koot
Thanks very much indeed for your comprehensive answer. I tried your code given for option 3. Works well, but your warning makes me hesitate. Well, I'll see. I already have a lot of old code no longer accepted by Racket. Not a big problem, but requires work to adapt. Thanks a lot again, Jos Koot --

[racket-users] Re: empty lines in a grammer of defform of scribble

2017-03-28 Thread Dupéron Georges
Le lundi 27 mars 2017 22:36:43 UTC+2, jos.koot a écrit : > When I use #:grammar in a defform, > the rules of the grammer are separated by empty lines. > > I would like to avoid these empty lines. > Is it possible? I haven't seen a built-in mechanism to control this. Generally speaking, the tools