Re: [racket-users] Re: Whalesong instead of Clojurescript

2016-09-03 Thread Shriram Krishnamurthi
There has indeed not been a lot of activity, but that doesn't mean it isn't functional. I've heard now and then of people using it. It's at least worth a try — a few minutes will let you know if it's suitable for your needs. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr

[racket-users] Re: Whalesong instead of Clojurescript

2016-09-03 Thread tbrooke
On Friday, September 2, 2016 at 1:46:29 PM UTC-4, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote: > On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 9:53:40 AM UTC-4, tbrooke wrote: > > I briefly looked at Whalesong and I was wondering if anyone is using it and > > if it is mature and ready to use. I use Clojurescript and it seems t

[racket-users] Re: Whalesong instead of Clojurescript

2016-09-02 Thread Shriram Krishnamurthi
On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 9:53:40 AM UTC-4, tbrooke wrote: > I briefly looked at Whalesong and I was wondering if anyone is using it and > if it is mature and ready to use. I use Clojurescript and it seems to me that > Whalesong should be equivalent with the advantage of allowing me to work