On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 3:22:59 PM UTC+1, Brian Adkins wrote:
> On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 9:06:16 AM UTC-5, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think maybe an xargs limit is being reached or something - when I scroll
> up, I see another total line is displayed for .rkt, so it's:
Yes, that's t
On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 9:06:16 AM UTC-5, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Jay's explanation sounds right to me.
>
> Naturally, we've wanted to move more code out of C for a long time. I
> think the pieces are finally moving into place so that it will really
> start to happen over the next year or s
Jay's explanation sounds right to me.
Naturally, we've wanted to move more code out of C for a long time. I
think the pieces are finally moving into place so that it will really
start to happen over the next year or so (but it's always difficult to
predict).
FWIW, I'm puzzled by the behavior of `
On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 8:08:58 AM UTC-5, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Brian Adkins wrote:
> > Excuse my ignorance of Racket internals & implementation, but I'm curious
> > about why the module system is implemented in C vs. Racket. Can someone who
> > is familia
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Brian Adkins wrote:
> Excuse my ignorance of Racket internals & implementation, but I'm curious
> about why the module system is implemented in C vs. Racket. Can someone who
> is familiar with it provide some insight?
I'll do my best. A large number of features
5 matches
Mail list logo
