subject:"\[racket\-users\] Raising multiple nonfatal errors without stopping evaluation"

Re: [racket-users] Raising multiple nonfatal errors without stopping evaluation

2017-08-17 Thread George Neuner

On 8/17/2017 11:47 AM, David Storrs wrote: On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Sam Waxman > wrote: Hey all, One of the things that confuses me most in Racket is good error handling, and the continuations that are involved. Is it possible to raise an

Re: [racket-users] Raising multiple nonfatal errors without stopping evaluation

2017-08-17 Thread David Storrs

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Sam Waxman wrote: > Hey all, > > One of the things that confuses me most in Racket is good error handling, > and the continuations that are involved. > > Is it possible to raise an error, have the user see it, but then still go > on running the code? I can current

[racket-users] Raising multiple nonfatal errors without stopping evaluation

2017-08-16 Thread Sam Waxman

Hey all, One of the things that confuses me most in Racket is good error handling, and the continuations that are involved. Is it possible to raise an error, have the user see it, but then still go on running the code? I can currently catch an error, display it as a string/other formats and th