I've been experimenting with 'shell/pipeline' on windows and post some
tests and example results here in case they are of use to others:
- basic examples demonstrating windows external commands,
- basic examples demonstrating windows internal commands with standard
cmd.shell,
- basic examples demon
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:59 AM, William G Hatch wrote:
> I've looked over the scsh docs at various times, though I've never
> actually used it -- it's never been pre-packaged for distros I've
> used, and every time I've tried to build it I've run into errors.
> Perhaps I should try again. As fa
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 4:17 PM, William G Hatch wrote:
> I'm really interested in people's thoughts about both parts and ways people
> think they could be improved.
Hi, William. Have you looked at ESHELL to see if it has anything of interest?
%(format-time-string "%D %H:%M:%S" (seconds-to-time
> On Aug 22, 2016, at 13:18, Vincent St-Amour
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:38:37 -0500,
> Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
>>
>> This discussion has reminded of SHILL
>> (https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi14/osdi14-paper-moore.pdf)
>> which is less user focused, and more sec
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:38:37 -0500,
Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
>
> This discussion has reminded of SHILL
> (https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi14/osdi14-paper-moore.pdf)
> which is less user focused, and more security / capabilities focused,
> but the prototype (in Racket) utilizes
This discussion has reminded of SHILL
(https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi14/osdi14-paper-moore.pdf)
which is less user focused, and more security / capabilities focused,
but the prototype (in Racket) utilizes contracts to enforce
capabilities checks.
I'm really into the idea of a
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:34:28AM -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> > On Aug 22, 2016, at 12:59 AM, William G Hatch wrote:
> >
> > is scsh what you consider natural?
>
>
> I’d like two different entry points:
>
> — one for people who program in zsh, bash, tcsh, csh, sh, and perhaps even
On Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:45:24 -0500,
William G Hatch wrote:
>
> > Is this at all related to Vincent's work? [1]
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/stamourv/rash
>
> I had no idea that existed. (in my defense, I did google "racket
> shell", "racket rash", etc before starting this)
>
> I'll have to
> On Aug 22, 2016, at 12:59 AM, William G Hatch wrote:
>
> is scsh what you consider natural?
I’d like two different entry points:
— one for people who program in zsh, bash, tcsh, csh, sh, and perhaps even more
primitive things (if they exist); scsh syntax appeals to those
— one for peopl
I've looked over the scsh docs at various times, though I've never
actually used it -- it's never been pre-packaged for distros I've used,
and every time I've tried to build it I've run into errors. Perhaps I
should try again. As far as the process syntax goes, a little bit of
macros over my pi
I just ran across this little thing:
https://asciinema.org/a/0utgivr7glk3ssn01fn5uwtey
People who want more shell ought to watch. It’s 2mins and cute — Matthias
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this gr
William & Norman,
as much as I give credit to scsh, I just think that taking clues from scsh is
enough. One could expand surface syntax into William’s pipe library for
example.
The irony is of course that scsh’s start-up time was so bad back then, that we
couldn’t use it for anything real.
William, hello.
On 20 Aug 2016, at 23:23, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
You may wish to read up on scsh. While it was way ahead of its
time, Olin Shivers made the syntax as natural as possible so it
would be quickly useful to people used to basic shell scripting
syntax. After all, this syntax has
I’d love to use a Racket shell and script Unix in a ‘natural’ way.
You may wish to read up on scsh. While it was way ahead of its
time, Olin Shivers made the syntax as natural as possible so it
would be quickly useful to people used to basic shell scripting
syntax. After all, this syntax has
Is this at all related to Vincent's work? [1]
[1]: https://github.com/stamourv/rash
I had no idea that existed. (in my defense, I did google "racket
shell", "racket rash", etc before starting this)
I'll have to look at it as well.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
Cool! Will definitely check it out.
Is this at all related to Vincent's work? [1]
[1]: https://github.com/stamourv/rash
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 3:17 PM, William G Hatch wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Being obsessed with shells and wanting very badly to have a racket
> shell, I've spent a good chu
Hello everyone,
Being obsessed with shells and wanting very badly to have a racket
shell, I've spent a good chunk of time over the last couple of weeks
working on shell-related stuff for Racket. First is a library for shell
pipelines (that may also contain racket functions). The interface is
ro
17 matches
Mail list logo
