Re: [racket-users] Racket 5, multiple-collection packages and info.rkt

2018-12-12 Thread 韋嘉誠
Right, that's a good option. For the moment, it wouldn't even need a branch, just point at the current version of the package while the 6.x-compatible version moves on. It's a mature package, and if people need any new functionality that gets implemented later, they should be prepared to upgrade Ra

Re: [racket-users] Racket 5, multiple-collection packages and info.rkt

2018-12-12 Thread Ben Greenman
Another option - make a branch for the Racket 5 code - add version exceptions [1] to pkgs.racket-lang.org - split the repo on the master branch The downside to this plan is that someone needs to add a version exception for every 5.x version of Racket that `graph` wants to support. [1] http://do

Re: [racket-users] Racket 5, multiple-collection packages and info.rkt

2018-12-12 Thread Stephen Chang
Hi Claes, Thanks for the effort in splitting the package. Would any users of the graph library object to dropping support for 5.x? On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:19 PM Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) wrote: > > I am trying to split the package graph into graph-doc and graph-lib, > see: https://github.com/stchang/

[racket-users] Racket 5, multiple-collection packages and info.rkt

2018-12-11 Thread 韋嘉誠
I am trying to split the package graph into graph-doc and graph-lib, see: https://github.com/stchang/graph/pull/37 So far, the package has been compatible with Racket 5.3.2, and I image the original author Mr. Chang would like to keep it that way, if possible. In their respective graph/info.rkt (