> On Feb 27, 2019, at 1:42 PM, Arthur Nunes-Harwitt wrote:
>
> Dear Matthias,
>
> Would you be willing to share your thoughts about the history of
> denotational versus operational semantics in the report?
[[ This is probably totally off topic for the list. ]]
Denotational semantics emer
Dear Matthias,
Would you be willing to share your thoughts about the history of
denotational versus operational semantics in the report?
Thanks.
==
Arthur Nunes-Harwitt
Computer Science Department, Rochester Institute of Technolo
This question has been burning me up as well.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:16 PM Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
>
> Let me inject some comments that make it a bit more obvious what’s
> happening here:
>
>
> > On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:33 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
> >
>
> RnRS meetings from 1984 th
Let me inject some comments that make it a bit more obvious what’s happening
here:
> On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:33 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
RnRS meetings from 1984 thru 2003 adhere to the “unanimity rule” originating
from the MIT group.
In 2001, I created and ran “Scheme and Functio
I think a genuinely detailed accounting of this has to wait for a
conversation over beer, but:
2003: New Scheme Standard proposed at the Scheme Workshop
2006: First draft of R6RS released
2007: R6RS Ratified by community vote after extensive discussion and revision
2009: A new Scheme Standard stee
What exactly is the history surrounding scheme, racket, and r6rs? I've
gotten vague impressions of serious scheme community conflicts around that
time but nothing specific. Does anyone have a timeline of important events
related to that?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
6 matches
Mail list logo
