Speaking of things with no docs, the abnf package seems intriguing. Does
anyone have a short summary or example?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019, 5:14 PM John Clements
wrote:
> Looks like… this is still the case? Specifically, reloading
> pkgs.racket-lang.org still shows that all packages are missing
> doc
Looks like… this is still the case? Specifically, reloading
pkgs.racket-lang.org still shows that all packages are missing documentation. I
thought I’d seen a message suggesting that this was resolved, but it appears I
was mistaken.
John
> On Feb 16, 2019, at 8:08 PM, David Storrs wrote:
>
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 9:18 PM Greg Hendershott
wrote:
>
> The package web site seems to think no packages have been built: The
> "Most recent build results" item is blank for every of the dozen
> packages I just checked.
Ah, that would do it. Thanks.
>
> So I think that's one problem.
>
>
> W
p.s. As another example of the current breakage: All my own packages
that do have documentation, have yellow "This package needs
documentation" demerit badges, at the moment.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 9:17 PM Greg Hendershott
wrote:
>
> The package web site seems to think no packages have been buil
The package web site seems to think no packages have been built: The
"Most recent build results" item is blank for every of the dozen
packages I just checked.
So I think that's one problem.
When that's working normally, as it usually does, there are two levels
of refresh:
1. The package catalog
Do I need to do something particular to make the package server notice
my documentation? I've got a scribblings/struct-plus-plus.scrbl file
but the package server is still listing it as "needs documentation".
Separate but related, when I install a module and it builds the
documentation, is there
6 matches
Mail list logo
