Thanks!
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:53 AM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Yes, that one (combined with the previous commit).
>
> At Mon, 7 Oct 2019 09:23:49 -0700, Stephen Foster wrote:
> > Awesome! Thanks. :)
> >
> > Just for my own curiosity, is it this commit or a different one?
> >
> >
> https://github
Yes, that one (combined with the previous commit).
At Mon, 7 Oct 2019 09:23:49 -0700, Stephen Foster wrote:
> Awesome! Thanks. :)
>
> Just for my own curiosity, is it this commit or a different one?
>
> https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/9bb5bc935251e25490dec82f824e1d8e9cd202c
> 9
>
>
>
Awesome! Thanks. :)
Just for my own curiosity, is it this commit or a different one?
https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/9bb5bc935251e25490dec82f824e1d8e9cd202c9
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 6:42 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Thanks for the report and simplification! I've pushed a repair.
>
> At
Thanks for the report and simplification! I've pushed a repair.
At Sat, 5 Oct 2019 15:33:31 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> This definitely seems like a bug. Here's a smaller program that shows it:
>
> #lang racket
> (begin-for-syntax
> (dynamic-require 'pict/code #f))
>
> Sam
>
> On Sat,
This definitely seems like a bug. Here's a smaller program that shows it:
#lang racket
(begin-for-syntax
(dynamic-require 'pict/code #f))
Sam
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 12:56 PM Stephen Foster wrote:
>
> I spent a few hours tracking down a mysterious bug. Although I've fixed it,
> I still don't
I spent a few hours tracking down a mysterious bug. Although I've fixed
it, I still don't understand it. I would appreciate some insight from those
who understand these things better.
Here's the simple reproduction:
*main.rkt*:
#lang racket
(define-syntax (test stx)
(dynamic-require "./
6 matches
Mail list logo
