On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:46 AM Christopher Lemmer Webber <
cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote:
> Jon Zeppieri writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:17 AM Christopher Lemmer Webber <
> > cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Any thoughts on how I should move forward?
> >
> >
> > I think that u
Jon Zeppieri writes:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:17 AM Christopher Lemmer Webber <
> cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Any thoughts on how I should move forward?
>
>
> I think that using a `data-procedure/c` of a particular sort should allow
> you to implement this without needing access to t
Philip McGrath writes:
> I've put up the code I mentioned for email-sending and a proxy server at
> https://github.com/LiberalArtist/multipart-writing-examples As noted, these
> are not general-purpose solutions to either of those problems—I know of a
> bunch of cases I don't cover, and I basicall
I've put up the code I mentioned for email-sending and a proxy server at
https://github.com/LiberalArtist/multipart-writing-examples As noted, these
are not general-purpose solutions to either of those problems—I know of a
bunch of cases I don't cover, and I basically only have to use these with
tr
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:17 AM Christopher Lemmer Webber <
cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote:
>
> Any thoughts on how I should move forward?
I think that using a `data-procedure/c` of a particular sort should allow
you to implement this without needing access to the struct internals or
needing to r
HTTP multipart reading is pretty easy to implement. You just want to be
careful about space&time performance -- not only because you might want
lots-and-lots of this processing going on on each server (and the costs
add up), but because the individual parts are quite often large (for the
purpo
On 1/29/2019 8:11 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:17:53 -0500, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote:
> Any thoughts on how I should move forward? Has anyone else written a
> multipart library I don't know about, for instance?
Is that the same as MIME's multipart as used in email? I
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 04:34:49AM -0500, Philip McGrath wrote:
> I don't think there's a multipart-writing library yet, and it would be a
> great thing to have.
>
> I've written little multipart-writing functions for a small proxy server
> built on `http-sendrecv/url` and for sending email using
At Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:17:53 -0500, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote:
> Any thoughts on how I should move forward? Has anyone else written a
> multipart library I don't know about, for instance?
Is that the same as MIME's multipart as used in email? If so, see
http://docs.racket-lang.org/net/mi
I see... yeah, I thought about going this route but the reason it didn't
seem particularly "robust" to me is that I would have to read the entire
object into memory at once before passing it in as bytes. IMO it would
be better to have the option to provide ports with file data so the data
could be
I don't think there's a multipart-writing library yet, and it would be a
great thing to have.
I've written little multipart-writing functions for a small proxy server
built on `http-sendrecv/url` and for sending email using `net/sendmail`
with html and text/plain alternatives. I'm happy to share c
I'm looking to do multipart HTTP requests in Racket, though it looks
like there's no support at the moment.
I thought I might add a utility using the net/http-client library,
starting with making an adjusted http-conn-send! function. However, the
http-conn-(host/port/etc) struct accessors aren't
12 matches
Mail list logo
