Re: [racket-users] Interoperability between Racket & Chez Scheme

2019-07-24 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 06:52:32PM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:14:56 -0700 (PDT), Brian Adkins wrote: > > With the Racket on Chez Scheme implementation, how interoperable are Racket > > and Chez? Is it possible for Racket functions to call Chez functions (or > > vice vers

Re: [racket-users] Interoperability between Racket & Chez Scheme

2019-07-23 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Tue, 23 Jul 2019 18:08:46 -0700 (PDT), Brian Adkins wrote: > For example, if I wrote a Chez Scheme library, how would I use that > from w/in some Racket code I wrote? After you get Chez Scheme's `eval`, you can do whatever you need at the Chez Scheme level. That includes loading Chez Scheme lib

Re: [racket-users] Interoperability between Racket & Chez Scheme

2019-07-23 Thread Brian Adkins
On Tuesday, July 23, 2019 at 8:52:36 PM UTC-4, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > At Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:14:56 -0700 (PDT), Brian Adkins wrote: > > With the Racket on Chez Scheme implementation, how interoperable are > Racket > > and Chez? Is it possible for Racket functions to call Chez functions (or >

Re: [racket-users] Interoperability between Racket & Chez Scheme

2019-07-23 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:14:56 -0700 (PDT), Brian Adkins wrote: > With the Racket on Chez Scheme implementation, how interoperable are Racket > and Chez? Is it possible for Racket functions to call Chez functions (or > vice versa) directly w/o using a FFI? If so, can you point me to some > documen

[racket-users] Interoperability between Racket & Chez Scheme

2019-07-23 Thread Brian Adkins
With the Racket on Chez Scheme implementation, how interoperable are Racket and Chez? Is it possible for Racket functions to call Chez functions (or vice versa) directly w/o using a FFI? If so, can you point me to some documentation? If not, how difficult would it be to make this happen? Thanks