On Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 12:45:36 PM UTC-4, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> Reordered slightly:
>
> At Thu, 25 Jul 2019 09:04:29 -0700 (PDT), Brian Adkins wrote:
> > I know Chez had a reputation for being a fast implementation - was
> > performance the main criteria?
> > [...]
> > Were there oth
Reordered slightly:
At Thu, 25 Jul 2019 09:04:29 -0700 (PDT), Brian Adkins wrote:
> I know Chez had a reputation for being a fast implementation - was
> performance the main criteria?
> [...]
> Were there other factors, in addition to
> performance, that uniquely qualified Chez?
Good performan
I'm curious about the process that resulted in selecting Chez Scheme as the
runtime for Racket.
I know Chez had a reputation for being a fast implementation - was
performance the main criteria? Were other Scheme implementations considered
& rejected? If so, why? Were there other factors, in ad
3 matches
Mail list logo