Re: [racket-users] Correcting documentation à la Beautiful Racket

2016-09-22 Thread Greg Trzeciak
Agree that adding more dependencies may be problematic. One solution would be instead of sending emails, to make this a true github issue creation method which can be done with a simple prepopulated HTML link, eg. (here title:"foo" and body:"bar"): https://github.com/mbutterick/pollen/issues/new

Re: [racket-users] Correcting documentation à la Beautiful Racket

2016-09-21 Thread Matthew Butterick
On Sep 21, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Greg Trzeciak wrote: > On the other hand I already shared my suggestion with Matthew Butterick twice > on hishttp://beautifulracket.com/ which made me realise how superior the kind > of direct interface as in the attached image is. You simply click on the > parag

Re: [racket-users] Correcting documentation à la Beautiful Racket

2016-09-21 Thread Jay McCarthy
Thanks for noticing the broken links. I fixed them. I really like the easy comment box idea. Jay On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Greg Trzeciak wrote: > I have found some dead links in the documentation I wanted to raise as an > issue or if I wouldn't find right repository post it to this mail

[racket-users] Correcting documentation à la Beautiful Racket

2016-09-21 Thread Greg Trzeciak
I have found some dead links in the documentation I wanted to raise as an issue or if I wouldn't find right repository post it to this mail group when I realised how many times in the past I didn't do anything about the noticed error. On the other hand I already shared my suggestion with Matth