Re: [racket] the Numbers grammar

Thanks! I'll fix the documentation. At Thu, 9 Aug 2012 02:07:43 +0100, milo arvidsson wrote: > I've been studying the numbers grammar in section 1.3.3 of the Racket > reference and I think I've spotted a few mistakes: > > 1. allows the imaginary part of an exact complex > number to be signed giv

[racket] the Numbers grammar

I've been studying the numbers grammar in section 1.3.3 of the Racket reference and I think I've spotted a few mistakes: 1. allows the imaginary part of an exact complex number to be signed given that an exact rational may be signed: ::= [] ::= / ::=i The rule allows exact complex num