Bleh, nevermind. It does work without the begin-for-syntax. I think I need a
syntax-local-transform, or whatever that function is that executes stuff at
phase+1.
My original code was working because I had provided the syntax class at phase 0
and 1, the non-working code only had the class at pha
Are you looking for the "reify-syntax-class" form from
syntax/parse/experimental/reflect, perhaps?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/syntax/Experimental.html?q=syntax/parse#%28form._%28%28lib._syntax/parse/experimental/reflect..rkt%29._reify-syntax-class%29%29
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:3
Ok but it still doesn't work if I take out the (begin-for-syntax).
(define-syntax-class x)
Now its defined at phase 0. Anyway if I can get the syntax class I can access
its attributes (ryan said it was ok).
On 02/27/2012 01:28 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> You've bound x at phase 1, but you're loo
You've bound x at phase 1, but you're looking up a phase 0 binding here.
Bug aside, I had no idea there was anything meaningful for external users
to do with the values underlying syntax classes. What does the value let
you do?
Carl Eastlund
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
I thought syntax-local-value would produce the syntax-class object that a given
identifier is bound to but it errors out with 'x is not defined as syntax'. Any
ideas why? There is one part of my original code base where this works and
another where it doesn't. I cannot seem to replicate the part
5 matches
Mail list logo
