On 04/04/2012 02:02 PM, Ray Racine wrote:
One more anecdote I also seem to recall Typed Racket uncovering a bug in
SRFI-19 string formatting code. I just can't say enough about the value
of Typed Racket.If it had a finger I'd put a ring on it.[1]
Ray
[1] No honeymoon jokes, or commentary o
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:39 PM, John Clements wrote:
>
> A quick scan of your repository suggests that you were also focused on
> julian<->date conversions and on formatting. Is this a fair summary?
>
> John
>
>
Yep.
The primary goal was to position everything where I had a top level suite
prede
On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:28 AM, Ray Racine wrote:
> Stay in the scheme sphere long enough everyone has their SRFI moment and one
> concerning SRFI-19 in particular. Here I refer to the, "that's it, I can't
> stand no more, by god, this time I'm going replace SRFI-19" moment.
>
> A couple of mont
Stay in the scheme sphere long enough everyone has their SRFI moment and
one concerning SRFI-19 in particular. Here I refer to the, "that's it, I
can't stand no more, by god, this time I'm going replace SRFI-19" moment.
A couple of months back I had my nth moment with SRFI-19 and my usual
partia
On Apr 4, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 01:46 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>> Rodolfo Carvalho wrote at 03/27/2012 03:27 PM:
>>> Actually, I wonder if people use any srfi much?
>>
>> Some people still use SRFIs with Racket (I don't anymore), but usually
>> Racket has somewhat
On 03/27/2012 01:46 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Rodolfo Carvalho wrote at 03/27/2012 03:27 PM:
Actually, I wonder if people use any srfi much?
Some people still use SRFIs with Racket (I don't anymore), but usually
Racket has somewhat better comparable features separate from SRFIs,
either built-in
Tom McNulty wrote at 03/27/2012 04:03 PM:
What is the official stance on using SRFI modules in new applications?
Non-official answer: If you want to use SRFIs, they're there, and you
should feel free to use them.
What I think people should *not* do is try to use RnRS and SRFIs
believing tha
For some reason I've been averse to them, perhaps for good reason other than
their distinction from the racket libraries. I began working with
scheme/racket relatively recently, so I probably do not fully appreciate the
historical rationale behind them. (I do fully understand the need for
b
Rodolfo Carvalho wrote at 03/27/2012 03:27 PM:
Actually, I wonder if people use any srfi much?
Some people still use SRFIs with Racket (I don't anymore), but usually
Racket has somewhat better comparable features separate from SRFIs,
either built-in or in PLaneT.
There are at least two mat
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 13:55, Joe Gilray wrote:
> Thanks (again) Rodolfo,
>
> Do people use the srfi/25 arrays much? [-snip]
>
> -Joe
>
I do not know. Actually, I wonder if people use any srfi much?
Sometimes they seem to me to don't fit well within Racket. Possibily it has
something to do wi
10 matches
Mail list logo
