On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 01:24 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>>
>> On 11/17/2011 01:20 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/17/2011 12:28 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
I have some code that deconstructs and reconstructs a syntax object. I'm
pretty sur
On 11/17/2011 01:24 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
On 11/17/2011 01:20 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
On 11/17/2011 12:28 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
I have some code that deconstructs and reconstructs a syntax object. I'm
pretty sure this code is at fault for not adding the proper lexical
context back on so I g
On 11/17/2011 01:20 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
On 11/17/2011 12:28 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
I have some code that deconstructs and reconstructs a syntax object. I'm
pretty sure this code is at fault for not adding the proper lexical
context back on so I get an error about 'no #%app bound'.
(syntax
On 11/17/2011 12:28 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
I have some code that deconstructs and reconstructs a syntax object. I'm
pretty sure this code is at fault for not adding the proper lexical
context back on so I get an error about 'no #%app bound'.
(syntax-parse form
[(form ...)
(with-syntax ([(fo
I have some code that deconstructs and reconstructs a syntax object. I'm pretty
sure this code is at fault for not adding the proper lexical context back on so
I get an error about 'no #%app bound'.
(syntax-parse form
[(form ...)
(with-syntax ([(form* ...) (map honu->racket (syntax->list #
5 matches
Mail list logo