Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-30 Thread Greg Hendershott
Although Windows path and file names preserve case, comparisons are not case-sensitive. This looks like a bug with the -S / --search command line parameter in the Windows version. WINDOWS c:\Users\Greg>racket -i -q -S C:/Users/Greg/site/geiser/scheme/racket -f c:/Users/Greg/site/geiser/schem

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-29 Thread Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
On Mon, Nov 29 2010, Greg Hendershott wrote: [...] > Just this: > > (load-file "~/site/geiser/elisp/geiser.el") > (setq geiser-active-implementations '(racket)) Looks right. >> What is the value of the variable >> geiser-scheme-dir inside Emacs (from the trace above, it should be >> something

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-29 Thread Greg Hendershott
In *scratch* (geiser-racket--parameters) says ("-i" "-q" "-S" "c:/Users/Greg/site/geiser/scheme/racket/" "-f" "c:/Users/Greg/site/geiser/scheme/racket/geiser/startup.rkt") which looks correct. When I run that manually in the shell: racket -i -q -S c:/users/greg/site/geiser/scheme/racket

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-29 Thread Greg Hendershott
P.S. When I said > (I don't think it can't "c:/users/greg/site/geiser/scheme/racket". > When I tried that, it was trying to do > "c:/users/greg/site/geiser/scheme/racket/racket", i.e. you seem to > append "racket" automatically.) I mean that for example that results in this error: Welcome to Rac

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-29 Thread Greg Hendershott
Hi, Jose. Thank you. > No adjustment of the collects path should be necessary: it's supposed to > be done automatically by geiser load scripts. Yes that seemed to be the case on OS X. > How are you loading geiser? (i.e., what's in your .emacs?) Just this: (load-file "~/site/geiser/elisp/geise

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-29 Thread Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
Hi, On Mon, Nov 29 2010, Greg Hendershott wrote: > This is working for me on Mac OS X. > > On Windows 7 I'm getting this error for run-geiser: > > > Welcome to Racket v5.0. > c:/Users/Greg/site/geiser/scheme/racket/geiser/startup.rkt:21:9: > geiser/user: standard-module-name-resolver: colle

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-29 Thread Greg Hendershott
This is working for me on Mac OS X. On Windows 7 I'm getting this error for run-geiser: Welcome to Racket v5.0. c:/Users/Greg/site/geiser/scheme/racket/geiser/startup.rkt:21:9: geiser/user: standard-module-name-resolver: collection not found: "geiser" in any of: (#) in: geiser/user === co

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-28 Thread Greg Hendershott
Ah -- thanks! On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28 2010, Greg Hendershott wrote: > >> Maybe it's just me, but >> >>   git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/geiser.git >> >> results in: >> >>   Cloning into geiser... >>   git.sv.gnu.org[0: 140.186.70.72]: errno=Ope

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-28 Thread Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
On Sun, Nov 28 2010, Greg Hendershott wrote: > Maybe it's just me, but > > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/geiser.git > > results in: > > Cloning into geiser... > git.sv.gnu.org[0: 140.186.70.72]: errno=Operation timed out > fatal: unable to connect a socket (Operation timed out) The serve

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-28 Thread Greg Hendershott
Maybe it's just me, but git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/geiser.git results in: Cloning into geiser... git.sv.gnu.org[0: 140.186.70.72]: errno=Operation timed out fatal: unable to connect a socket (Operation timed out) at the moment. On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Noel Welsh wrote: >

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-26 Thread prad
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:27:41 -0500 Neil Van Dyke wrote: > For Racket, I think you don't need to distinguish between > "scheme-send-definition" and "scheme-compile-definition" -- just > pretend that the ``compile'' isn't there. > yes i discovered that last night. > That said, if there's still s

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-26 Thread Neil Van Dyke
prad wrote at 11/26/2010 03:11 AM: i'm trying to get quack to work with emacs and it is very nice for the most part. however, i can't get C-c C-c to work. C-c C-c doesn't work. It's a cmuscheme.el thing that I never touched, since Quack is supposed to work for all Schemes. For Racket, I thin

Re: [racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-26 Thread Noel Welsh
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, prad wrote: > any thoughts on what i can do to get C-c C-c working? Dunno (I develop in a different style) but I can recommend the Geiser Emacs package: http://www.nongnu.org/geiser/ It has been worked on more recently AFAIK, so might work for you. HTH, N. __

[racket] quack qunundrum

2010-11-26 Thread prad
greetings! i just started with racket having done a bit of mit-scheme and commonlisp. i'm trying to get quack to work with emacs and it is very nice for the most part. however, i can't get C-c C-c to work. if i go to the middle of something like: (define (add3 n) (+ n 3)) and do C-c C-c (comp